Tuesday, May 05, 2009

Wrongfully Imprisoned for 27 years, but cough up for room and board.

Andrew Mallard has been awarded $3.25 million as compensation for the twelve years he spent behind bars in Western Australia for a murder he didn't commit. This figure is nowhere near a just amount for the more than a decade spent behind bars. No amount of money can ever compensate for that loss.

In the UK on March 9 this year, Sean Hodgson was released after 27 years in prison. He was, like Mallard in WA, banged up for a murder he didn't commit.

Hodgson will undoubtedly be eventually compensated by the British Government for this miscarriage of justice. Unlike Australia, however (as far as I am aware), he will have his payout docked for almost three decades' worth of room and board (or "saved living expenses" as they call it). His lawyers estimate this will be at least 100,000 pounds. Don't believe it? It's happened before!

Greatest justice system in the world, eh?

Monday, May 04, 2009

As Cities Go From Two Papers to One, Talk of Zero

March 12, 2009
The New York Times

As Cities Go From Two Papers to One, Talk of Zero

The history of The Seattle Post-Intelligencer stretches back more than two decades before Washington became a state, but after 146 years of publishing, the paper is expected to print its last issue next week, perhaps surviving only in a much smaller online version.

At least Denver, Seattle and Tucson still have daily papers. But now, some economists and newspaper executives say it is only a matter of time — and probably not much time at that — before some major American city is left with no prominent local newspaper at all.

Many critics and competitors of newspapers — including online start-ups that have been hailed as the future of journalism — say that no one should welcome their demise.

Read the full story here.


Stop press

Stop press

Across the country, local newspapers are being cut to the bone or closed down. Is regional journalism doomed? And if it is, what does that mean for local democracy?

Read the full article here.


Sunday, May 03, 2009

Braz and Scott age disgracefully


As per the previous story, I turned forty recently. Braz followed last weekend, on April 26. To celebrate these auspicious events, we had a party on March 28 at the Derwent Mercantile Rowing Club just upstream from the Tasman Bridge on the Derwent. It was a grand affair, with two barrels of ale, a disc jockey and lashings of beetroot and chocolate cake, lovingly baked by Katie and Sophie, to Caroline's recipe.

It all ended in tears and the crack of leather on skin. Wouldn't have had it any other way.

There's some photos here (NSFW in the slightest).


And Simon has an album of photos here. Some general Hobart tourist snaps mixed in to the bag, as they came down from Sydney especially, as did Louisa from Vegas. Thanks y'all!

My Birthday

It was my 40th birthday over a month ago now. I think I've now adjusted enough to life in my fifth decade to release stories and photos of this event.

For my actual birthday, Katie took me to a town a bit north of Hobart called Melbourne.
For lunch, we went to a fantastic restaurant called Transport, where I had rabbit, and Katie had Wagyu Beef, washed down with lashings of expensive wine.
It was fantastic. We stayed at the Rialto on Collins Street, a flashy five star joint that had only just been reopened. Quite a stunning setting, the main atrium is actually an old laneway between two former market buildings.

After a post-lunch siesta we headed west on Melbourne's fantastic public transprt system (that makes Sydney's look like downtown Berlin, circa August 1945) to my cousin Andrew's pub, Grumpy's Green, where we met up with Alexis, John, Robbie, and Phil. Oh and the landlord, who insisted that I sample all manner of strange ale, lager and porter. Unfortunately, nobody thought to take any photos.

Anyhow, that was my actual birthday, March 25 to be precise. Thank you Katie for making it so amazing, and for helping me to ease into my dotage that little bit easier.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Hobart's ANZAC Day Parade


Uncle Ian (behind RH shoulder of marshall in orange jacket) marches down Macquarie Street with his comrades. Larger view here.

Ian with a comrade in New Guinea, April 1944.

It was bucketing with rain on ANZAC Day morning. I'm sure the Dawn Service musty have been pretty hard going. But, come 10am, an hour before the main parade kicks off, the rain decided to abate.

I headed down to the city, camera in hand ready to watch, and to get a couple of photos of my Uncle, Ian Tynan who served in the RAAF in New Guinea in WWII.

I got a perfect spot, right outside The Mercury building, and directly opposite the Town Hall, where the Governor takes the salute.

First off down Macquarie Street were five infrantry on their horses. Then came those no longer able to walk the parade route, ferried in buses, taxis and WWII Jeeps.

After that, came the various units and battalions, starting with the Boer War, then to WWI (our grandfather, Algy Tynan fought in the 1/12th). It's quite poignant and emotional to see the signs for the units being borne by schoolchildren, with no actual servicemen left. Pop died in 1974, and I think Tasmania's last WWI Veteran died about three or four years ago. I have quite vivid memories of going to the marches with Mum, Dad and Brent when we were kids.

Pop's Battalion, the 1/12th.

A War memorial Portrait of Pop, 1914.

The crew of the HMAS Darwin, in town for ANZAC Day duty were impressive as they marched past with "eyes righted" to the plinth.

As it got to the WWII units, I was keeping my eyes peeled for Ian and his crew. I don't know what happened, but I bloody well missed him as he marched straight past my vantage point. Luckily, I got a picture of the RAAF unit just as it left Franklin Square, and can make Ian out in the shot. Still, quite dissapointing that I missed him.

It's funny how my attitude has changed over the years, from a kid not really understanding what it was all about, to young adult, not wanting anything to do with the march, apart from the opportunity for another holiday, to now, where I'm thinking about what these people must have gone through, and how they're still here today. While I'm by no means a proponent of war as a means of resolving anything, I do thank those who marched, and those who didn't or couldn't for all they've done and been through for the greater good. And Ian, I'll get a much better picture next year!

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Morgan Mark & Scott do Tassie

Reece Dam spillway.


Morgan kindly decided to cross the ditch and come over to Tasmania over Easter. Of course, Mark and I sumised, this was cause for a roadtrip.

We picked the intrepid Dr Read up from Hobart International on Good Friday morning, and immediately set about heading west. Initial pub stops were at the Gretna Green and Derwent Bridge pubs. I decided to grace the public bar of one of the pubs in beautiful Queenstown while the lads did battle with the local greasy takeaway. Queenstown really is a unique place!

After Queenstown, we scooted up to Zeehan and in to Trial Harbour, a beautiful windswept bay dead on the West Coast proper. After a brisk stroll along the beach and a visit to the history rooms, we departed Trial and headed for our accomodation at the Heemskirk Motor Inn. I suspected we may have been up for a ropey meal when I asked if the seafood basket was local. "Nuh" came the swift reply. Rightio, steak and veg it was then. Kinda hard to bugger that one up I reckon. Ordered rare, it came out medium-rare. Perfecto (oops, it was Good friday! Sorry, pope!).

Post dinner saw us demolish a few coldies and start on the Glenmorangie back in the motel room.

Saturday we departed beautiful Zeehan by 9.30, and pointed Mark's Henry in the general direction of Cradle Mountain. We ended up going over the Pieman River Road, and across the Reece Dam. Think we went almost two hours without seeing another vehicle. No matter your thoughts re: the mighty Hydro, they did build some bloody amazing infrastructure in their time. after a reasonable lunch and (finally) some caffeine at the Cradle Mountain Chateau (of course, owned by Federal and funded by Pokie revenue) we entered the National Park and did a three point five hour walk to Marion's Lookout, just below the summit of Cradle Mountain. Spectacular views all round, for sure.

On the Overland Track

Saturday night we stayed at the Gowrie Park Backpacker accomodation, at $15 for individual two-bunk unit things, the place was pretty basic, but after a hearty meal at the Sheffield Pub and much home brew and whisky in the common room, we all slept like dead men.
Sunday morning we departed via brekky at a cafe in Sheffield for a pretty straightforward belt back to Hobart.

You've gotta love a roadtrip!

There's a full Album of pictures here, by the way.

Mark surveys all at his feet.
At Marion's Lookout. Cradle Mountain in background.

Thursday, April 09, 2009

Today on Sullivans Cove



There's a ship (The Bryggen from Bergen) tied up on Macquarie Wharf. They've flooded the front holds so as they can work on the propellor or something similar.

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

Video reveals G20 police assault on Man who died

Exclusive footage obtained by the Guardian shows Ian Tomlinson, who died during G20 protests in London, was attacked from behind by baton–wielding police officer

Dramatic footage obtained by the Guardian shows that the man who died at last week's G20 protests in London was attacked from behind and thrown to the ground by a baton–wielding police officer in riot gear.

Moments after the assault on Ian Tomlinson was captured on video, he suffered a heart attack and died.

The Guardian is preparing to hand a dossier of evidence to the police complaints watchdog.

It sheds new light on the events surrounding the death of the 47-year-old newspaper seller, who had been on his way home from work when he was confronted by lines of riot police near the Bank of England.

The submission to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) includes a collection of testimonies from witnesses, along with the video footage, shot at around 7.20pm, which shows Tomlinson at Royal Exchange Passage.

The film reveals that as he walks, with his hands in his pockets, he does not speak to the police or offer any resistance.

A phalanx of officers, some with dogs and some in riot gear, are close behind him and try to urge him forward.

A Metropolitan police officer appears to strike him with a baton, hitting him from behind on his upper thigh.

Moments later, the same policeman rushes forward and, using both hands, pushes Tomlinson in the back and sends him flying to the ground, where he remonstrates with police who stand back, leaving bystanders to help him to his feet.

The man who shot the footage, a fund manager from New York who was in London on business, said: "The primary reason for me coming forward is that it was clear the family were not getting any answers."

The Guardian's dossier also includes a sequence of photographs, taken by three different people, showing the aftermath of the attack, as well as witness statements from people in the area at the time.

A number of witnesses provided time and date-stamped photographs that substantiate their accounts.

Some said they saw police officers attack Tomlinson.

Witnesses said that, prior to the moment captured on video, he had already been hit with batons and thrown to the floor by police who blocked his route home.

One witness, Anna Branthwaite, a photographer, described how, in the minutes before the video was shot, she saw Tomlinson walking towards Cornhill Street.

"A riot police officer had already grabbed him and was pushing him," she said.

"It wasn't just pushing him – he'd rushed him. He went to the floor and he did actually roll. That was quite noticeable.

"It was the force of the impact. He bounced on the floor. It was a very forceful knocking down from behind. The officer hit him twice with a baton when he was lying on the floor.

"So it wasn't just that the officer had pushed him – it became an assault.

"And then the officer picked him up from the back, continued to walk or charge with him, and threw him.

"He was running and stumbling. He didn't turn and confront the officer or anything like that."

The witness accounts contradict the official version of events given by police.

In an official statement on the night of Tomlinson's death, the Metropolitan police made no reference to any contact with officers and simply described attempts by police medics and an ambulance crew to save his life after he collapsed – efforts they said were marred by protesters throwing missiles as first aid was administered .

The force said officers had created a cordon around Tomlinson to give him CPR.

"The officers took the decision to move him as during this time a number of missiles - believed to be bottles - were being thrown at them," it said.

Yesterday, the IPCC began managing an investigation by City of London police into the circumstances of Tomlinson's death after the Guardian published photographs of him on the ground and witness statements indicated he had been assaulted by police officers.

The IPCC commissioner for London, Deborah Glass, said: "Initially, we had accounts from independent witnesses who were on Cornhill, who told us that there had been no contact between the police and Mr Tomlinson when he collapsed."

"However, other witnesses who saw him in the Royal Exchange area have since told us that Mr Tomlinson did have contact with police officers.

"This would have been a few minutes before he collapsed. It is important that we are able to establish as far as possible whether that contact had anything to do with his death."

The IPCC added that Tomlinson was captured on CCTV walking onto Royal Exchange Passage.

"This is the aspect of the incident that the IPCC is now investigating," it said.

It was here the video was shot. A post mortem carried out by a Home Office pathologist last Friday revealed Tomlinson died of a heart attack.

Prior to seeing the dossier of evidence, Tomlinson's family said in a statement: "There were so many people around where Ian died, and so many people with cameras, that somebody must have seen what happened in the Royal Exchange passageway.

"We need to know what happened there and whether it had anything to do with Ian's death.

"We know that some people who were at the protest may not feel comfortable talking to the police.

"People are putting pictures on the internet, writing on blogs and talking to journalists. But we really need them to talk to the people who are investigating what happened."

Full investigation in tomorrow's Guardian

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2009

Thursday, April 02, 2009

Penny for your thoughts, Phil?

Coca Cola tells lies. It does rot your teeth

Coca Cola busted for big fat rotten lies

Coca-Cola has been ordered to publish corrective advertisements over its controversial "Motherhood & Myth-Busting" advertising campaign featuring actor Kerry Armstrong, which came under widespread attack last year.

Using the wholesome motherly image of Armstrong to convince parents the soft drink was "kiddy-safe", the advertisements claimed Coca-Cola did not make children fat, did not rot their teeth and was not packed with large amounts of caffeine.

Such claims were myths, Armstrong vowed in full-page print advertisements which ran nationally throughout October last year.

"Now that I've found out what's myth and what isn't, it's good to know that our family can continue to enjoy one of our favourite drinks," Armstrong gushed.

"My boys now call me Mum, the Myth Buster!"

The actor's young children may have been convinced by the performance, but the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission was not.

"Coke's messages were totally unacceptable, creating an impression which is likely to mislead that Coca-Cola cannot contribute to weight gain, obesity and tooth decay," said the ACCC's chairman, Graeme Samuel.

"[The ads] also had the potential to mislead parents about the potential consequences of consuming Coca-Cola."

Today, Coca-Cola South Pacific gave the ACCC court-enforceable undertakings to publish corrective advertisements in The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Australian, The Courier Mail, the Adelaide Advertiser, The West Australian, and the Hobart Mercury, as well as on the company's own website.

The correct levels of caffeine for Coca-Cola, Diet Coca-Cola and Coca-Cola Zero must be included in the corrective advertisements, the ACCC ruled, because of the false claims in the original campaign that the soft drink contained the same amount of caffeine as tea brewed from leaves or bags.

Kelly Burke is the Herald's Consumer Affairs Reporter.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Australian government secret ACMA internet censorship blacklist, 6 Aug 2008

Australia secretly censors Wikileaks press release and Danish Internet censorship list, 16 Mar 2009

March 16, 2009
Download from
fast site, current site, Sweden, US, Latvia, Slovakia, UK, Finland, Netherlands, Poland, Tonga, Europe, SSL, Tor

Summary

The first rule of censorship is that you cannot talk about censorship.

In late 2008, Wikileaks released the secret Internet censorship list for Denmark, together with a press release condemning the practice for lack of public or judicial oversight. Here's an extract from the press release:

The list is generated without judicial or public oversight and is kept secret by the ISPs using it. Unaccountability is intrinsic to such a secret censorship system.
Most sites on the list are still censored (i.e must be on the current list), even though many have clearly changed owners or were possibly even wrongly placed on the list, for example the Dutch transport company Vanbokhorst.
The list has been leaked because cases such as Thailand and Finland demonstrate that once a secret censorship system is established for pornographic content the same system can rapidly expand to cover other material, including political material, at the worst possible moment -- when government needs reform.
Two days ago Wikileaks released the secret Internet censorship list for Thailand. Of the 1,203 sites censored this year, all have the internally noted reason of "lese majeste" -- criticizing the Royal family. Like Denmark, the Thai censorship system was originally promoted as a mechanism to prevent the flow of child pornography.


An Australian anti-censorship activist submitted the page to the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), requesting that they censor it, under their internal guidelines. The activist wished to expose the "slippery scope" of the proposed Mandatory Internet Censorship scheme.

The press release and the list itself have now been placed into the secret Australian government blacklist of "Prohibited Online Content".

The content on the blacklist is illegal to publish or link to in Australia, with fines of upto $11,000 a day for contraventions.

The ACMA blacklist is proposed to become the list with which the Australian Government will mandatory block all Australians Internet requests. Presently censorship of access attempts by ISPs is voluntary. The Australian government has faced strong opposition over the scheme, with the Liberal (conservative) and Green (liberal left) opposition parties stating they will vote against it.

See also:

The downloadable file contains a PDF of the request. What follows is the emailed reply from ACMA, agreeing to the censorship request. At no stage did the Australian government contact Wikileaks.

ACMA reply received today 16/3/09 at 2:49 pm Australian time:

Complaint Reference: 2009000154 / ACMA-1303474585
Dear *******

I refer to the complaint that you lodged with the Australian
Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) on 19 February 2009 about
certain online content.

Following investigation of your complaint, ACMA is satisfied that
the Internet content specified in your complaint is hosted outside
Australia, and that the content is prohibited content or potential
prohibited content as defined by Schedule 7 to the Broadcasting
Services Act 1992.

The Internet Industry Association (IIA) has a code of practice
(http://www.iia.net.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=415&Itemid=33)
for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) which, among other things,
sets out arrangements for dealing with such content. In accordance
with the code, ACMA has notified the above content to the makers
of IIA approved filters, for their attention and appropriate action.
The code requires ISPs to make available to customers an IIA approved
filter.

On this occasion ACMA has also referred the matter to the appropriate
law enforcement agency.

Information about ACMA's role in regulating online content (including
internet and mobile content), including what is prohibited or
potentially prohibited content is available at ACMA's website at
www.acma.gov.au/hotline

Thank you for bringing this matter to ACMA's attention. Please
contact the Content Assessment Section at online@acma.gov.au if you
have any further questions about this matter.

Yours faithfully
Content Assessment Section
Australian Communications and Media Authority
  1. ↑ *http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1158941&p=44#r873
Context
Australia
Government (bureaucracy)
Australian Communications and Media Authority
File size in bytes
41582
File type information
PDF document, version 1.3
Cryptographic identity
SHA256 6eb77a35cca57b9892ad4cf156b4b8bb2d02fed1d624a41badfb50fac72d92a1

Sunday, March 15, 2009

A spot of hog tyin and sausage makin



Katie and I went down to visit Duncan and Jeannie at Gordon's Knob yesterday. Armed with our trusty Moulinex mincer, our main aim was to make some sausages with some of the pork from the pigs that were slaughtered around Christmas time. Another task was to help Duncan move one of the piglets he had sold to a couple down the road. After a couple of doses of Dutch Courage, we went down to the shed where the three piglets and Mother Darcy were staying. We led Darcy to the paddock across the road, so as she didn't start getting too wild while we were taking her progeny away. This part of the operation went quite nicely, with her quite happy to follow the bucket of feed through the gates.



Once Darcy was redomiciled, we set to with shifting the piglet. The three of them were gated in the shed with a couple of upturned apple crates. with Katie making sure they couldn't push the crates over while we were going for the capture, Duncan and I entered the pen. Check this video to see the result.


If the video doesn't work, it's on YouTube here as well.

The bastards jumped over the apple crates, off to the to the top paddock and way away from us real quick. Anyhow, that was pig capture over for the evening. We led Darcy back to the shed so as to attract the piglets back, and headed back to the house, pork chops and potatoes and some cold homebrew.

The sausage making was a much more succesful operation. We blended 1500 grams of pork with a few breadcrumbs, some white and balck pepper, some salt, a pinch of mace and 45 leaves of sage from our garden in West Hobart. Fed the lot throught the mincer, stuffed it in the casings by way of funnel and reamer, exclude the air, twist and tie.



And hey presto, our first bunch of bangers! We left them overnight to let the flavours settle in, and had them for breakfast.



Absolutely sensational, if I do say so myself. We had some mince left over, so Katie whipped together for a couple of post-breakfast scotch eggs, which were equally scrum!



We'll be getting into some more sausage making real soon, that's for sure. It's nice to have proper, 100% pork snags rather than the more predominant beef that seems to be the norm in Australia. they even put it in salami over here!

Oh, and the pig shifting...we managed to do it. The screaming is something you really don't want to subject yourself to. I was holding the front legs with the buggers face next to mine, and Duncan managed to sustain a trotter in the ribs. Both scarred for life I think!

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Foster's woos spurned Cascade drinkers

Foster's cans 330ml stubbies

February 24, 2009 - 2:34PM
http://business.smh.com.au/business/fosters-cans-330ml-stubbies-20090224-8ggp.html

Brewing giant Foster's is sheepishly reversing a marketing brain snap in Australia that tried charging the same price for less beer in a smaller "European-style'' stubbie.

Foster's infuriated drinkers in March last year by downsizing four of its 375ml Cascade range of stubbies by 45ml to a "sleeker'' 330ml bottle without changing the retail price.

Outraged drinkers quickly labelled it a rip-off, turning their backs on the brand as a groundswell of protest erupted, spawning several website campaigns against the brewer.

Foster's spokeswoman Felicity Watson said today sales of the nationally distributed flagship Cascade Premium Lager nosedived by 33% after the Euro folly.

Emotions ran high, she said.

"At the time that the millilitres dropped the wholesale price remained the same, and so did the recommended retail price,'' Ms Watson said.

Foster's never intended to rip off its customers or make them unhappy by giving them less beer for the same money, she said.

"We made some changes to Cascade and we acknowledge we made the wrong changes and we acknowledge that we got it wrong and now we are bringing back the 375ml,'' she said.

"It was the wrong thing to do and we totally admit that and we are copping it on the chin.''

Cascade Blonde and Cascade Stout and Pale Ale are also all due to be resized to 375ml later this year.
Fosters first announced its Cascade size reversal, of the predominantly Tasmanian-sold Pale Ale, in October last year.

Its decision to resize its nationally-sold premium lager was announced on Tuesday.

Some retailers have reported a 50% drop in sales of the beer.

Ms Watson said Foster's remained hopeful spurned drinkers would return to the brand after the brewer promised to change its ways.

"We'd love them them back and we hope with the changes we've made that they will come back,'' she said.

AAP

Monday, February 23, 2009

A day up the Florentine

CLICK ON IMAGES FOR FULL PERSPECTIVE
Pernilla, Don, Christine & myself went for a day trip to the Upper Florentine Valley the other day to check out some of the awesome Tasmanian wilderness, as well as the "Exclusion Zone" declared by Forestry Tasmania while they construct a road into the heart of the valley with the express aim of ripping out as much timber as possible. We met up with some of the "possums" camped up there under the "Still Wild Still threatened" banner, and doing their level best to protect the forest from the ravages of large scale, old school forestry. The structures, treesits and other assorted blockade devices are quite ingenious.


If you get the chance, go up there and have a look...it's only 100km from Hobart, and will galvanise your opinion on what the Bartlett Government should be doing in terms of forestry policy.


The walk was fantastic. We must have traversed five different types of environment in an hour and a half, from reasonable rainforest with 80 metre high (at a guess) eucalypts to fern covered plains to the beautiful Florentine River. It's an easy walk if you're semi fit. Take some lunch and your camera. And some food for the people on the blockade...they'll appreciate it.

CLICK ON IMAGES FOR FULL PERSPECTIVE

And if you want to see the rare Tasmanian Redneck (chainsawus fuckwittus) in their native environment, go for a beer at the National Park Pub.

Disloyal, lazy, no balls: it's time to move on, Peter

  • John Hewson
  • February 22, 2009
  • http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/disloyal-lazy-no-balls-its-time-to-move-on-peter-20090221-8e6v.html?page=-1

PETER. Enough is enough. If your few remaining mates won't tell you, I will. You've had a fair go. If you now won't give others a chance and pull your weight as a member of the team, you should move on.

It is most unlikely that you will ever be drafted as leader of the Liberal Party, and even less likely that you will ever be prime minister.

You can't go on ignoring the facts.

You have only ever had a minimal support base and that base has been further and terminally eroded by your disloyalty, antics and shenanigans of the last year or so.

Perhaps, ironically, although I doubt that you will admit it, your best chance to be leader was when you let Downer lead the "Dream Team" that took over the leadership from me back in 1994. If not, then certainly when Downer fell over a few months later.

You didn't have the balls to seize the moment then, leaving the leadership by default to John Howard. And you haven't had the balls, or the numbers, since.

It's no use trying to argue that you had some sort of "secret" deal with Howard that he would move over for you after some "reasonable period". You know Howard was never in any position to deliver, even if he ever recognised that he had made such a "core" promise.

And all that nonsense that you went on with before the last election, claiming that (Ian) McLachlan had carried evidence of such a "deal" in his wallet for several years, is simply that, nonsense. It was just another example of your disloyalty to the party and of your willingness to destabilise in pursuit of your personal, unattainable ambition.

You also know that the party room is always the final arbiter in leadership matters, and when a position is declared vacant there is never any shortage of those prepared to pull their batons from their knapsacks.

It's also clear that you have never really worked the back bench as would be necessary to build the numbers — some say simply because of your arrogance, others put it down to you not wanting to be identified as having first-hand involvement, hoping to create the impression that your supporters were building the momentum for a draft. Either way, it was generally counterproductive and too smart by half.

Moreover, all the polling that I have ever seen or heard of — Liberal, Labor or from wherever — has had you as unelectable.

This should be enough to convince you, but if not, then you should have an honest look at yourself. You are bone-lazy. Just count your output, press releases/conferences, speeches, electoral visits, and other examples of your work ethic or "availability" compared with (say) Paul Keating when he was treasurer.

I also doubt that you have the skills, experience or self-confidence to have accepted the obvious job for you, having decided to stay on after losing the last election: namely, shadow treasurer. You'd be lost without Treasury. You may have delivered 11 budgets, but ask yourself honestly how many of them were actually yours, rather than Treasury's. I am told that Treasury is now drawing a sharp contrast between your little interest and involvement and that of Wayne Swan.

You should also recognise that your indulgent "memoirs" released recently did not provide the platform from which you had obviously hoped to be drafted. They were received with a yawn. They are most unlikely to be a best-seller. Indeed, they were already being sold at a discount in my local bookstore in just a few days.

But, most importantly, they fuelled yet another round of leadership speculation, again making the Opposition the focus of exhaustive and sustained media attention, leaving the Government to skate by without essential scrutiny. I have absolutely no doubt that you would be going ballistic if the shoe was on the other foot and you were being undermined.

Both sides of politics know from painful experience that disunity is death in politics, although, like you I'm sure, I found it a bit galling to hear Howard saying so, having been disloyal to, and sought to undermine, every leader that he ever worked for.

Despite what the Government says, the risk and opportunity of an early election later this year is very real, especially if my worst fears of the tanking of our economy through this year are confirmed.

After the damage that you have done, the best you can now do to help our chances is to leave.

John Hewson is a former leader of the Liberal Party. He fought and lost the 1993 election against Paul Keating.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Queen Victoria hits Hobart

Click image for full size.
Cunard's Queen Victoria was in Hobart yesterday. It's slightly more attractive then the floating blocks of flats that seem to have been tying up in port recently.

Still, I reckon a berth on the QV is substantially more costly than one on the Mickey Mouse IV. Though, nowhere near as great as the QE2.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Xenephonophobia*?

$42b stimulus package sunk

  • Phillip Hudson
  • February 12, 2009 - 5:15PM

The Federal Government's $42 billion economic stimulus package has been sunk in the Senate with independent Nick Xenophon joining the Coalition and voting against it.

The five Greens senators and Family First's Steve Fielding voted for it but the ballot was tied 35-all in the Senate, meaning the legislation was defeated.

It means low and middle income workers and families will not get the $12 billion in one-off cash bonus payments promised last week by the government and more than $28 billion worth of spending on school repairs and upgrades, building new homes and providing free ceiling insulation will not go ahead unless the government can find one more vote.

The government immediately laid the blame with Malcolm Turnbull and the Opposition for voting against the package.

South Australian independent Senator Nick Xenophon demanded $5 billion be brought forward from future years to buy back water and improve irrrigation infrastructure along the ailing Murray-Darling Basin.

The government offered $410 million, including about $200 million this financial year.

Senator Xenophon said that was not credible and he could not vote for the package.

"I didn't come to Canberra to make friends," he said.

"I came here to make a difference. I won't walk away from the people of the Murray-Darling basin".

'Sabotage'

The Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, said the package would be reintroduced into the House of Representatives today because the $42 billion in spending was "urgent and in the national economic interest''.

The Treasurer, Wayne Swan, said the Opposition had voted against jobs and nation building and they had "effectively sabotaged the Australian economy''.

Mr Turnbull fired back, saying Mr Rudd's "economic policy is in tatters'' because he had assumed the Opposition and Senator Xenophon would get out of the way of his bulldozer.

"The government is in a hole of its own making,'' Mr Turnbull said. "The Prime Minister has refused to negotiate.''

He said Mr Rudd had treated the Parliament with "disingenuous contempt''.

Mr Turnbull last week said he believed the package should be worth $15 to $20 billion rather than $42 billion and tonight urged Mr Rudd to "open the door'' to negotiate.

"We stand ready to sit down with the Prime Minister to discuss the composition, the design of an appropriate fiscal stimulus package.

"We are committed to that, we are determined to do it.

"All he has to do is open the door. We can meet and I'm sure that with good will we can resolve on measures that will then have the support of both sides of politics.''

Unemployment up

As the Bureau of Statistics today said the unemployment rate had risen from 4.5 to 4.8 per cent, Senator Fielding said the package was "flawed" because it would leave 300,000 extra people unemployed.

He wanted to divert $4 billion of the $42 billion to an undefined job creation scheme, but the government rejected that idea.

"The government in its desire to push this package through swiftly, basically has held a gun to the heads of the cross bench.

"We were damned if we voted for it. We were damned if we voted against it," Senator Fielding said.

The Victorian senator said he walked the streets of Canberra for an hour at midnight last night.

"Family First wanted to support a stimulus package," he said. "But I have reservations about this package".

He said he found himself between two hard places - the government and the Opposition - and a rock - the Australian people that are hanging on in desperate times.

The five Green senators voted with the government after winning several concessions from the government, including reducing the $950 cash bonus payments to $900 with the money saved being used to pay for community job schemes, bicycle paths and heritage projects.

Greens leader Bob Brown said the government had also promised to consider increasing the aged pension in the May budget, give more funding to the Bureau of Statistics and boost funding for a national bushfire research centre in Melbourne.

"We're moving to a wiser, greener, more socially just country because of these ammendments," he said.

http://www.smh.com.au/national/42b-stimulus-package-sunk-20090212-85of.html?page=-1

*The words xenephonophobia & xenephonophobic are copyright Scott Plimpton 2009

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Grumpy's Green

My cousin Andrew has opened a pub in Fitzroy, 125 Smith Street in fact.

It's called Grumpy's Green, and you can check out the website here.

Even better, go and grab a beer and a bite. And tell him I sent you. He looks like this:

Possibly without the Santa hat. Though not guaranteed.